| sitewide file access: public=blue members=green | Checking For Login |


2007-08-10
The Aardenburg Digital Print Research Program - and Pilot Project
I want to create a significant archive of representative print samples. I want to document how artists create them, what materials and processes are common, what the image quality is like, and how these finished prints age over time. Let's call this research objective the "Aardenburg Digital Print Research Program." It is a tall order, one that would not be possible without personal computers and the internet, and one that will ultimately require thousands of samples to be anything more than merely a "proof of concept" exercise. Where does one start? - with my first participant and a lot of youthful enthusiasm... a bit tough for an aging baby boomer, but I'm not going to be discouraged by obvious limitations! Huge numbers of samples are ultimately needed in order to be truly representative of this modern era of digital photography. Our modern photographic era is anything but simple. The choices we have today for making images, printing images, storing images, and distributing images are vastly more bountiful than what existed fifteen or twenty years ago. I want to look carefully at one specific aspect of this complex digital photographic world, namely, the digitally mastered prints.
I was initially thinking very conventionally about how Aardenburg could contribute to the body of published research results available on the image quality and image permanence of modern digital prints. I thought about equipping my lab with the typical instrumentation and performing the conventional accelerated aging tests. No doubt I will do more laboratory testing in time because I have been personally involved in this type of research for many years and am pretty good at it. However, I realized that the endusers of this technology (photographers, artists, printmakers, etc.) don't necessarily choose technologies I choose, print the way I print, or finish their prints the way I finish them. Nor could I possibly acquire all of the diverse printers, inks, and papers necessary to gain a suitably representative sample population of modern digital print technologies. Moreover, although laboratory studies can provide some "apples-to-apples" comparative test results in an expedient way, extrapolating those results to real world conditions is problematic at best. The real world is simply too environmentally diverse for scientists to successfully define one common environmental standard that reasonably reduces the test results to a simple summary which applies to all consumers equally. A sorely needed piece of this puzzle is a very comprehensive real world testing and monitoring program that reaches beyond the walls of museums and archives. Museums and archives have a rich tradition of research projects that attempt to environmentally document and monitor changes taking place over time for art on display in their protected museum environments or in transit for art on loan to other institutions. The Museums and Archives community has therefore paved the way for real world environmental studies, except that the typical museum environment is not the consumer's or individual collector's environment. Thus, the idea for the Aardenburg Digital Print Research program is to extend and enhance museum monitoring protocols for research in the consumer home and office environment.
To date, I have briefly mentioned how I plan to gather temperature, humidity, and light intensity data. The devil is always in the details, but hopefully, you now have some idea as to how that aspect of my real world research program is going to work. Yet I haven't indicated what measurements will be collected from the digital prints or how I will implement this component of my research. Well, it will involve spectral measurements of specific colors and tones that get printed directly by the artist/printmaker while the actual prints are being made. First, there will be a "standard set" of colors which is common to every printed sample irrespective of what colors actually exist in the artist's image. Many photographers will instantly recognize the majority of the colors in Aardenburg's standard color set because they are the basis for a "de facto" color reproduction standard widely used in the photographic industry today. Aardenburg's standard set contains all 24 colorimetrically defined values of the GretagMacbeth ColorChecker® chart. These 24 colors are digitally mastered and printed within the color gamut and rendering parameters of each printing system.
The GretagMacbeth ColorChecker® Chart, originally developed by C. S. McCamy, H. Marcus and J. G. Davidson in 1976 as a color reproduction test for photography, television and printing, is used widely today for digital photography color accuracy tests and color profiling. Thus, it has an over 30 year track record in the photographic industry for color and tone reproduction evaluation. Although its colors do not challenge the full color range of most modern imaging and printing systems, several colors in the chart spectrally mimic known human memory colors (e.g., light skin tones, dark skin tones, blue sky, green foliage, etc). With respect to image permanence testing, the 24 target colors have enough chroma and hue variety to exercise the necessary colorant mixing and blends that need to be assessed for chemical aging interactions.
A digital file prepared with added color target data in a format printable on a desktop printer using letter-size paper. Larger prints produced on large format printers will have ample room to locate the Aardenburg color target data that will be required for the real world digital print research. For a full PDF version of this illustration click here.